cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
cheating forgery law legal cases Secrets
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It's also a well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has long been or will be filed.
extensive period petitioner wasn't regarded as for promotion, meeting of the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding case law on caveat emptor attained via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it ideal to the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision of the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice just isn't served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service in the grievance notice can be a mandatory prerequisite in addition to a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law calls for that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to comply with.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which includes eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature in the seized currency.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that might be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not binding precedent.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children while in the home. The boy was placed in an crisis foster home, and was later shifted all around within the foster care system.